‘The perfect slave is free’

Victor Langheld 1976 (alias Bodhangkur)

Or: ‘The perfect sub-server becomes (is @1 with) the master server, hence free (-r).’

Victor 2016

Within samsara (meaning endless re-birth/death) those who perfect their dharma get promoted (i.e. promote themselves towards eventual freedom from re-death);

those who fail to perfect their dharma get demoted (i.e. demote themselves).

The Jina Upanishad

Reified (i.e. quantised ≈ bit) notions	Synonyms	The analogue, meaning serial (or bite) view The non-reified view	Notes This, the missing and wholly optimistic, hence politically incorrect because a-political 14^th Upanishad, is reconstructed from scattered intuitions/statements in the Veda, Yoga, Buddhism and from direct observation of the most common everyday human survival activity.
perfect	≈ complete ≈ whole ≈ @ min.entropy ≈ enstatic ≈ closed or ended as fact	Perfecting ≈ per’facting ≈ ending ≈ terminating	Perfection happens at function completion ≈ 100% algorithm application ≈ fractal elaboration ending and when @min.entropy status is attained and the process presents as whole, steady state, i.e. as enstatic quantum.
Slave (-ing)	≈ dependent servant ≈ slave as secondary to n^th sub-server Note: The master (and who appears free, meaning independent, to the servant/slave) functions merely as 1^st or primary servant/server/ algorithm.	Dependent slaving ≈ serving as : an (wholly recursive output generating) algorithm ≈ a fractal (that generates n elaborations)	Dependent (on conditions or rules) origination, meaning fundamental slavery, was discovered by Siddartha, the Scythian recluse, later called the Buddha. ‘Conditions determine form, not an (abiding) self (or soul).’ Contact (meaning copulation of 2 random quanta) creates is’ness/realness, i.e. a 1c^2 moment. A slave (i.e. as sub-server) is a quantum that submits (or surrenders) its output (i.e. its dharma capacity) to a master (server). Slaves (i.e. sub-servers) are fundamentally female, because submissive. They achieve libido highs (and thereby the honeymoon affect) via surrender, meaning penetration (producing fertilization). The purpose/dharma of the slave is to execute the master’s need deriving from the master’s dharma imperfection. Hence the purpose of a dynamic living system is to execute the need of the imperfect Atman/Brahman, imperfect because lacking form and realness, thus consciousness. It is this latter and exceedingly troublesome understanding that is missing from the main Upanishads and the vast collection of commentaries. By executing one’s dharma perfectly one as it were merges with (and becomes) the Atman/Brahman and so attains to the latter’s freedom.
is	≈ @ c^2≈ momentary is’ness	creates a series of is’ness moments/quanta falsely named ‘being’	A 1c^2moment (in other words a contact as copulation between 2 random (or differential) quanta) presents as (minimum) quantum (i.e. bit) of knowledge.
free (s)	≈ random (access) ≈ unlimited ≈ independent	≈ non-relative (bit) momentum ≈ random movement ≈ virtual (non-located) presence	The slave (i.e. a, i.e. any and every slave routine as fractal elaboration) becomes (i.e. emulates, copies) master (i.e. the master routine as fractal), hence free, by means of self-perfection, i.e. completion. Attempting to achieve freedom (i.e. moksha) by the (pessimistic, indeed life denying) means proposed in the Upanishads (and in parts of Yoga/Samkya, Buddhism, Jainism and so on) and further developed by foolish Brahmin bookworms, such as Nagarjuna and Shankara, namely by restricting, i.e. reverting from self-application (i.e. towards ‘factory settings’, i.e. to the nirguna Brahman/Atman) defeats the purpose of the universal Brahman/Atman function-as-algorithm, namely creation the pays off with sat-cit-ananda, and reveals ignorance (Sanskrit: avidya) of the true understanding of tattvamasi.
as a master	≈ as a monad ≈ as a random (albeit virtual) event that carries instruction, hence can create moments of is’ness and series of moments of is’ness experienced as real forms (i.e. identities or selves)	≈ mastering ≈ applying the brahman/atman dharma ≈ god rules ≈ algorithm perfectly (to a locality or niche)	Perfect execution of a slave routine (i.e. a dependent dharma) synchronises, i.e. becomes one with the master routine (i.e. the independent dharma). The perfect slave is indistinguishable from, because unified with, the master and therefore experiences the master’s freedom. By perfecting momentarily one’s dependent dharma one resonates (momentarily) wholly with the universal, wholly independent dharma (of Brahman/Atman) and is momentarily free (of samsara ≈ the grind of imperfect serving resulting in unhappiness, pain and so on).

Copulating (or coupling) one’s perfected (one down) slave routine with the (one up) master routine transfers the master routine’s (one up) freedom to the sub-routine.

From Action to Realness A Minimal Ontology of Energy, Mass, and c²

© 2016 Victor Langheld