‘The perfect slave is free’

                                                                                                       Victor 1976

 

 

Or: ‘The perfect sub-server becomes (is @1 with) the master server, hence free (-r).’

                                                                                                                                                                                                Victor 2016

 

 

Within samsara (meaning endless re-birth/death) those who perfect their dharma get promoted (i.e. promote themselves towards eventual freedom from re-death);

those who fail to perfect their dharma get demoted (i.e. demote themselves).

 

 

The Jina Upanishad

 

 

Reified

(i.e. quantised ≈ bit)

notions

 

 

 

Synonyms

 

The analogue, meaning serial

(or bite) view

The non-reified view

 

 

Notes

 

This, the missing and wholly optimistic, hence politically incorrect because a-political 14th Upanishad, is reconstructed from scattered intuitions/statements in the Veda, Yoga, Buddhism and from direct observation of the most common everyday human survival activity.

 

 

perfect

 

 

≈ complete ≈ whole ≈ @ min.entropy     enstatic

≈ closed or ended as fact

 

 

   Perfecting ≈ per’facting ≈ ending ≈  terminating

 

Perfection happens at function completion ≈ 100% algorithm application ≈ fractal elaboration ending and when @min.entropy status is attained and the process presents as whole, steady state, i.e. as enstatic quantum.

 

 

Slave (-ing)

 

 

 ≈ dependent servant ≈ slave as secondary to nth sub-server  

 

Note: The master (and who appears free, meaning independent, to the servant/slave) functions merely as 1st or primary servant/server/ algorithm.         

 

 

   Dependent slaving ≈ serving as :  an (wholly recursive output generating) algorithm  ≈ a fractal (that generates n elaborations)

 

 

Dependent (on conditions or rules) origination, meaning fundamental slavery, was discovered by Siddartha, the Scythian recluse, later called the Buddha. ‘Conditions determine form, not an (abiding) self (or soul).’ Contact (meaning copulation of 2 random quanta) creates is’ness/realness, i.e. a 1c2 moment.

 

A slave (i.e. as sub-server) is a quantum that submits (or surrenders) its output (i.e. its dharma capacity) to a master (server).

Slaves (i.e. sub-servers) are fundamentally female, because submissive. They achieve libido highs (and thereby the honeymoon affect) via surrender, meaning penetration (producing fertilization).

 

The purpose/dharma of the slave is to execute the master’s need deriving from the master’s dharma imperfection. Hence the purpose of a dynamic living system is to execute the need of the imperfect Atman/Brahman, imperfect because lacking form and realness, thus consciousness. It is this latter and exceedingly troublesome understanding that is missing from the main Upanishads and the vast collection of commentaries. By executing one’s dharma perfectly one as it were merges with (and becomes) the Atman/Brahman and so attains to the latter’s freedom.

 

 

is

 

 

≈ @ c2  ≈ momentary is’ness

 

   creates a series of is’ness moments/quanta

   falsely named ‘being’

 

 

A 1c2 moment (in other words a contact as copulation between 2 random (or differential) quanta) presents as (minimum) quantum (i.e. bit) of knowledge.

 

 

free (s)

 

 

≈ random (access) ≈ unlimited ≈ independent

 

      non-relative (bit) momentum

random movement

virtual (non-located) presence

 

 

The slave (i.e. a, i.e. any and every slave routine as fractal elaboration) becomes (i.e. emulates, copies) master (i.e. the master routine as fractal), hence free, by means of self-perfection, i.e. completion.

 

Attempting to achieve freedom (i.e. moksha) by the (pessimistic, indeed life denying) means proposed in the Upanishads (and in parts of Yoga/Samkya, Buddhism, Jainism and so on) and further developed by foolish Brahmin bookworms, such as Nagarjuna and  Shankara, namely by restricting, i.e. reverting from self-application (i.e. towards ‘factory settings’, i.e. to the nirguna Brahman/Atman) defeats the purpose of the universal Brahman/Atman function-as-algorithm, namely creation the pays off with sat-cit-ananda, and reveals ignorance (Sanskrit: avidya) of the true understanding of tattvamasi.

 

 

as a master

 

≈ as a monad ≈ as a random (albeit  virtual) event that carries instruction, hence can create moments of is’ness and series of moments of is’ness experienced as real forms (i.e. identities or selves)

 

 

≈ mastering ≈ applying the brahman/atman dharma

≈ god rules

≈ algorithm perfectly (to a locality or niche)

 

Perfect execution of a slave routine (i.e. a dependent dharma) synchronises, i.e. becomes one with the master routine (i.e. the independent dharma). The perfect slave is indistinguishable from, because unified with, the master and therefore experiences the master’s freedom.

 

By perfecting momentarily one’s dependent dharma one resonates (momentarily) wholly with the universal, wholly independent dharma (of Brahman/Atman) and is momentarily free (of samsara ≈ the grind of imperfect serving resulting in unhappiness, pain and so on).

 

 

 

Copulating (or coupling) one’s perfected (one down) slave routine with the (one up) master routine transfers the master routine’s (one up) freedom to the sub-routine.

 

 

© 2016 Victor Langheld